The Metacognition Survey try a 65-product scale regularly measure the thinking men and women have about their considering

The Metacognition Survey try a 65-product scale regularly measure the thinking men and women have about their considering

It include four items: confident proper care viewpoints (“Alarming helps us to stop dilemmas afterwards”), philosophy on uncontrollability and you may possibilities (“My alarming is unsafe in my situation”), cognitive skills (“I have little count on in my own memory to possess terms and conditions and you can labels”), standard bad viewpoints (“Easily didn’t handle a distressing envision, immediately after which it just happened, it could be my personal fault”), and you may intellectual self-awareness (“I believe a lot from the my view”). New metacognition survey was scored inside the good 4 section size out of 1 (“don’t concur”) so you can 4 (“concur definitely”) and had a great Chronbach’s alpha = .88. This new metacognition questionnaire has been used widely inside non-clinical examples such as for instance smokers and you may children [44, 45]. A whole get is actually calculated in order to create an index off metacognition for every single participant.

Brand new Fanatical-Fanatical Index are a 42-items thinking-report questionnaire, assessing the seriousness of certain obsessions and you may compulsions of OCD from inside the people . The brand new obsessive-compulsive directory consists of 7 subscales that come with washing (“I wash my give with greater regularity or more than called for”), checking (“I go to towns with the intention that I’ve maybe not injured anyone”), denying (“Even though I actually do anything meticulously I believe which isn’t a little proper”), purchasing (“I get disturb in the event the other people enjoys changed how i has created my personal something”), obsessing (“I’ve found it difficult to manage my personal viewpoint”), hoarding (“I assemble something Really don’t you would like”), and you can neutralising (“I feel I have to recite particular wide variety”). So it directory try scored towards an effective cuatro part Likert level, from 1 (“definitely not”) in order to 4 (“extremely”) and had a beneficial Chronbach’s leader = .88. A whole score try calculated to make you to definitely rating for every single fellow member related to O-C periods.


A chance attempt out of university students participated in the study. Members was basically first and foremost given information regarding the study and you can offered the ability to make inquiries about any of it. Immediately following providing concur, for each and every new member provided group pointers, after which was presented with brand new four forms during the a good counterbalanced purchase to resolve at their unique day. If participant completed they was thanked and you will debriefed. Most of the information and functions then followed the latest ethical recommendations and procedures outlined by the American Mental Relationship and you can had been checked and approved by College of Hertfordshire integrity panel (Number:14149216).


Research is processed to own forgotten beliefs, outliers and you will assumptions from statistical investigation just before one study . All parameters had appropriate viewpoints getting skewness and you may kurtosis no extreme outliers. Bivariate correlations of countless every determined spiders revealed self-confident and you may tall connectivity between them (Dining table step one). The strongest association try involving the spiders of condition and you may characteristic anxiety, accompanied by the newest relationship between stress awareness, metacognition and you can O-C episodes.

Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].

In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.

0 commenti

Lascia un Commento

Vuoi partecipare alla discussione?
Sentitevi liberi di contribuire!

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato.

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.